Custom and Usage Ruled Not
a Defense to
Copyright Infringement

by Joel Hecker, Esq.

Advance Notes: For photobuyers: Publication of photographs in magazines or elsewhere without the prior consent of the copyright owner, which use is then followed by a "proposed" contract or license containing terms unacceptable to the photographer, will not, under most guidelines, be a successful defense to copyright infringement.

 


It is surely not a good sign for a defendant accused of copyright infringement when the Federal District Court, in evaluating a defense that "everybody does it" and that use without consent is the prevailing custom and usage of the trade, makes a factual finding that the defendant "deliberately sailed in harm’s way."

That is the predicament Similar Entertainment, Inc. found itself in after Judge Kaplan in the Southern District Court in New York issued an injunction back in March of 1999 against them for copyright infringement, and in favor of Cherry River Music Co.

The case involved the creation and distribution of a Compact Disc of musical themes of popular WWF wrestlers, called Slammin’ Wrestling Hits, without obtaining the appropriate copyright permissions.

The impact of the decision is applicable to photography as well.

The defendant apparently believed they had completed the necessary requirements to obtain a compulsory license which permits use of musical compositions through payment of a license fee.


However, after the defendant knew, or reasonably should have known, that such a license had actually not been obtained, the defendant still failed to apply for it. Then, after the copyright owner commenced the copyright infringement action, the defendant delayed a hearing on the injunction application while continuing to manufacture and distribute the goods in an obvious attempt to circumvent any prohibition on such distribution.

The defendant argued that music companies [read publishers of photographs!] routinely, as part of custom and usage in the industry, publish music before obtaining such licenses. The Court ruled otherwise, holding there were no prior dealings between the parties which might establish such a practice, and that the defendant failed to meet the test of establishing such a custom which includes "numerous purchases over a period of time."

The Court issued an injunction and ordered a modified recall of the CD’s shipped, at considerable expense to the defendant.

Attorney Joel L. Hecker lectures and writes extensively on issues of concern to the photography industry. His office is located at Russo & Burke, 600 Third Ave, New York NY 10016. Phone: 1 212 557-9600. E-mail: HeckerEsq@aol.com.


 





Your Name:
Your Email:
Their Name:
Their Email:

Evaluate this article

Please take a moment to fill out this form. Your time and feedback are greatly appreciated.

Name:
Email: 

How would you rate this article?
     (Lowest) (Highest)

What stock photography topics are you most interested in reading about?
     

What improvements or changes would you suggest for this article or the PhotoResearcher newsletter?